Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Roy Schestowitz Lies Again] [Rival] Microsoft Sabotages MBR (GNU/Linux) with Windows Update (was: [News] [Rival] Microsoft Sabotages MBR (GNU/Linux) with Windows Update)

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Rick
<none@xxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote
on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:43:51 -0500
<MOmdnRYo9t-KF2PanZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:45:21 -0400, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:51:28 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> 
>>> Vista SP1 won't install on dual-boot systems: Microsoft
>>> 
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| If you?re dualbooting Windows Vista Enterprise or Ultimate alongside a
>>>Linux | distro, and have installed the Linux bootloader into the MBR,
>>>then you?re | guaranteed to run into problems when installing Vista
>>>Service Pack 1, | Microsoft has admitted.
>>> `----
>>> 
>>> http://apcmag.com/
> vista_sp1_wont_install_on_dualboot_systems_microsoft.htm
>> 
>> Once again, you lie about the articles you quote.  Your headline
>> "Microsoft Sabotages MBR (GNU/Linux) with Windows Update" is saying that
>> Microsoft replaces the MBR, but that's false.  It doesn't, and the
>> article explicitly says that.
>> 
>> There's a simple way to boot Linux with Vista, though.  Use the Vista
>> bootloader to boot Linux.  It's not difficult to setup, there are a
>> number of howto's out there and a few programs to do it for you, such as
>> EasyBCD.
>
> Why should you have to do that when there is perfectly good boot loader 
> already installed?

On most Vista machines, that would be the Vista bootloader. ;-)

I'll admit to some curiosity as to whether Vista's bootloader,
which I suspect is identical to the old NT/2k/XP bootloader,
will work the same way with GRUB.  GRUB has no trouble at all
booting XP.

Not that I plan on getting the Very Irritating, Silly,
and Terminally Asinine product anyway. ;-)

>
>> 
>> If Microsoft really wanted to disable Grub or Lilo, why would they limit
>> this update to only Enterprise and Ultimate?  Why wouldn't they replace
>> the MBR like your headline claims?
>> 
>> No, you simply want to lie about Microsoft.
>


-- 
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Useless C++ Programming Idea #12995733:
bool f(bool g, bool h) { if(g) h = true; else h = false;  return h;}

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index