On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:24:17 +0100, Hadron wrote:
> Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:20:53 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> Rex Ballard <rex.ballard@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Feb 4, 8:56 am, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Microsoft's Security Claims Don't Stand Up to Scrutiny
>>>> [snip Roy's excellent collection of links showing the flaws of
>>>> Microsoft's security claims).
>>>>
>>>> Fundamentally, the bottom line with security is "Will I be attacked".
>>>
>>> Wrong. The bottom line is : I will be attacked. Can I make myself safe?
>>
>> You beat me to it.
>> Rex's latest contribution to the cesspool has to be one of the most
>> convoluted arguments for or against (I can't tell which?) security I have
>> ever read.
>
> You seriously read an entire Rexx script? Wow. Jane Eyre would be easier.
Yea, time for some strong cafe......
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
|
|
