Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Boost versus TBB

  • Subject: Re: Boost versus TBB
  • From: Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:54:25 +0100
  • Bytes: 3459
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:zFHGRKbxXgpN3qunGVuBLazpNBk=
  • Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAKlBMVEUEAgJbIBVoY15hUCmc FhbtGBOVZkLntRzywheujjymop7OsJ7u07Lq6eilId+TAAAACXBIWXMAAABIAAAASABGyWs+AAAB 60lEQVQ4y83STUgVURjG8f85k6j3lp6xTS6MMaGNGiP0DQVhtAssolbWLAJBau2mYnLRx06Ckhbl bIooBGkXGAZBFPQxcKNNdNNNRMid46LIdDot7nTHcaZ9Zzk/znvmfXgk/zjyv4ftqhjkvRvF0Cp6 txWCoPbQKQKD/Hw5D5a7gqbDWg/WqzvT4oq52AzQFYCE6QBo4ffPqKYqWwD0fpDg+vWbQj1STy4B OMvpqBjhg1R9LsgZAxLCx8Ay/AAwIaKXsoMEtzwA8RlMAHyFvhkYR1IivODAh6nB+5raUagAZUfS g+v6YG4ed0d2HQGsGBiXlg8xAN78JwMQ7x6if68sAaEH8K2a/KGuDFsvZVc/30/+zcE+fMIGeDEk pFVhR/rdFoMAvB+WuM8bue+kyWv2kqSb3niNgBWy2xxL0n3beAAgMitWvgw2lCYIiuujk6Uy4Ca0 HjbUa/UuB5tmdRTpgpZEWq0+VcnAzBvWYsji7LM8rM5pMxflR2VPHsRABjw6gE727Rk7NbEGrM7b ZwHn6oFD8CUFcWtrtUfRelB0K8XmFFpqUB1RbYIlkgrU4bRYsG3b0/VQSinYKMD+1Q6w5KfgAGDM uQUdtU3qFKYAzDzx5LXro3rNHq/bNWwM8pvHo3c/PjifCeAPa9eNC9aoFNgAAAAaelRYdEpQRUct Q29sb3JzcGFjZQAAeNozAgAAMwAzERZ+YwAAACp6VFh0SlBFRy1TYW1wbGluZy1mYWN0b3JzAAB4 2jOqMNIxrDDUMawwBAARgwLpBsTKKAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
  • References: <Ch0pj.89710$K27.50529@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu Debian-Lenny)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:601959
Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Just a quick opinion question.  Anybody use Boost and Intel's Thread
> Building Blocks?  Any key differences?  Have any preference?
>
> Intel has open-sourced their commercial product under GPLv2 with a
> run-time exception (July of last year, it looks like).  This article
> talks about it:
>
>    http://blogs.computerworld.com/node/5894
>
> Poor Roy gets dinged, though:
>
>     Roy Schestowitz got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning:
>
>      Nice publicity stunt, but everyone already knows that Intel
>      doesn't give a **** about open source (unless it means money)


Roy Schestowitz is a closed source and patent advocate when it suits
him. He is simply deranged.

>       ...
>      Doesn't Intel have another charitable not-for-profit
>      project to sabotage today? And trust me, I say this
>      because I know. Intel deserves this treatment because it
>      has earned it over time. Not to mention monopoly abuse
>      and many misuses that directly hurt rivals, destruction
>      of E-mails (court evidence), fake benchmarks... [more] 
>
> Another dude compares TBB and OpenMP.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index