On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:59:36 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> ____/ William Poaster on Wednesday 20 February 2008 15:20 : \____
>
>> Linonut wrote:
>>
>>> * amicus_curious peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>>
>>>> "Andy C.(never #)" <acamfield@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:6bb4aede-b9db-4980-b621-0b19bb87125e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> On Feb 19, 9:58 am, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> [I know Andy C posted this, but here's more information:]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Microsoft to give out development tools to students
>>>>>>Translation: force feed innocents
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Roy. Keep hitting 'em where it hurts.
>>>>>
>>>> Looks like you guys are scared to death! Well, you should be. Who's going
>>>> to want to fool around with that homemade stuff when they can use
>>>> professional grade tools? Just a few losers, I would imagine, the same
>>>> ones as can't get a job now.
>>>
>>> Dude, does Microsoft /pay/ you to act the fool?
>>
>> You don't know that amicus_curious aka billwg is Bill Weisgerber?
>>
>> Google for Bill Weisgerber and you will see that this twat has done
>> his shill service for MS for years, always in the same *extremely* dishonest
>> way.
>
> It's him. He's trying to deny this to create less than total certainty. It's
> the same with Gary Stewart. When Microsoft is decomissioned (one way or
> another) we'll find out the scale of their shilling here and elsewhere. It's a
> fact; not a speculation. It needn't be a check but a form of compensation.
> Microsoft has done a lot of this in the past year (with hard evidence). If you
> dare to state this, some anonymous coward comes up with words
> like "conspiracy" or "paranoid" etc. etc.
Yet every time you are asked for proof of your accusations, you run and
hide.
It's common sense Schestowitz, that if you actually had any factual
evidence of your claims you would be spewing it from one end of the
Internet to the other.
The truth is, you have no proof of anything you have said above.
You are a phony, a liar and a paid spammer.
> Ask people in Slashdot who saw people /admitting/ that they did this (shilled
> for the abusive monopoly).
People who saw people?
In a court of law, that is called hersay and is not admissible as evidence.
You will learn that in good time Roy Schestowitz.
You are a complete farce Roy Schestowitz.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
|
|
