On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:51:49 +0000, Kier wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:02:17 -0500, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:58:41 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>> In article <0v1v55-41s.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> One could begin to believe that maybe it's just a person site, until you
>>>> realise that the guy who writes "OPLC News" actually works for Intel on
>>>> the competing Classmate PC, and he's *bought* advertising at Google for
>>>> his "personal blog" which just happens to have taken the name of a
>>>> project which competes with his day job.
>>>>
>>>> What an appalling state of affairs.
>>>
>>> What is this, a FUD relay race? After Roy acknowledges that this story
>>> was wrong, you grab it and start spreading it? See
>>>
>>> <http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416106&cid=22017038>
>>
>> I guess they are trying to do to slashdot what they have done to COLA.
>> IOW the same 3 posters talking to each other.
>>
>> BTW Roy has multiple accounts on Slashdot. He also posts as Anonymous
>> Coward" over there.
>
> Do you have any actual proofg of that or are you just continuing to sling
> mud in the hope it will stick?
He posted a message here in COLA a day or 2 ago where he said he posted
here as Anonymous Coward just to see what happened.
Seems really a coincidence that there is a post from an Anonymous Coward
over on Slashdot and in the thread where Roy's Intel OLPC conspiracy
theories are being ripped to shreds by Mary Lou Jepsen.
The words, the style all match Roy to a Tee.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fc9984b34e24d81d
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416106&cid=22017038
Sound like anyone we all know and love?
See the strange, non human like formatting of the message?
Of course, you will need a signed CV for proof because you are just like
they are, in total denial.
Common sense and reason don't seem to be your strong point Kier.
|
|
