Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Windows Vista SP1 Renders Some More Hardware Obsolete

  • Subject: Re: Windows Vista SP1 Renders Some More Hardware Obsolete
  • From: Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:54:21 +0100
  • Bytes: 4634
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:AkEDy1mPid4lJCVOvCN1dZEEFV4=
  • Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAKlBMVEUEAgJbIBVoY15hUCmc FhbtGBOVZkLntRzywheujjymop7OsJ7u07Lq6eilId+TAAAACXBIWXMAAABIAAAASABGyWs+AAAB 60lEQVQ4y83STUgVURjG8f85k6j3lp6xTS6MMaGNGiP0DQVhtAssolbWLAJBau2mYnLRx06Ckhbl bIooBGkXGAZBFPQxcKNNdNNNRMid46LIdDot7nTHcaZ9Zzk/znvmfXgk/zjyv4ftqhjkvRvF0Cp6 txWCoPbQKQKD/Hw5D5a7gqbDWg/WqzvT4oq52AzQFYCE6QBo4ffPqKYqWwD0fpDg+vWbQj1STy4B OMvpqBjhg1R9LsgZAxLCx8Ay/AAwIaKXsoMEtzwA8RlMAHyFvhkYR1IivODAh6nB+5raUagAZUfS g+v6YG4ed0d2HQGsGBiXlg8xAN78JwMQ7x6if68sAaEH8K2a/KGuDFsvZVc/30/+zcE+fMIGeDEk pFVhR/rdFoMAvB+WuM8bue+kyWv2kqSb3niNgBWy2xxL0n3beAAgMitWvgw2lCYIiuujk6Uy4Ca0 HjbUa/UuB5tmdRTpgpZEWq0+VcnAzBvWYsji7LM8rM5pMxflR2VPHsRABjw6gE727Rk7NbEGrM7b ZwHn6oFD8CUFcWtrtUfRelB0K8XmFFpqUB1RbYIlkgrU4bRYsG3b0/VQSinYKMD+1Q6w5KfgAGDM uQUdtU3qFKYAzDzx5LXro3rNHq/bNWwM8pvHo3c/PjifCeAPa9eNC9aoFNgAAAAaelRYdEpQRUct Q29sb3JzcGFjZQAAeNozAgAAMwAzERZ+YwAAACp6VFh0SlBFRy1TYW1wbGluZy1mYWN0b3JzAAB4 2jOqMNIxrDDUMawwBAARgwLpBsTKKAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
  • References: <17659721.TA6cMLcbYB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <im3s55-77i.ln1@xxxxxxxxxx> <fmg008$rmm$5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <c3c355ee-4a96-48f5-ac33-14e4ec9f524d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu Debian-Lenny)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:593704
Rex Ballard <rex.ballard@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Jan 14, 10:44 am, Hadron <hadronqu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "[H]omer" <s...@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> > Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>
>> > Like I said in another thread, ATi is increasingly the choice for
>> > gamers, and this is just one of many reasons why. They were first
>> > to bat with support for Compiz (GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap), and
>> > again the first with a Free Software initiative (nVidia is on the
>> > fence with that one).
>
> I have an ATI FireGL graphics card, and the graphics is great.
> Battlezone is really fast, as with most other 3D graphics.  I'm not a
> big fan of games, but what I have seen, I like.

"from what you have seen"

Battlezone?!?!?!

>
>> NVidia cards are in 90% of Linux machines which use any HW acceleration
>> at all. Why? Because ATIs Linux support has been total shit. And you
>> know it. You're just sucking their dicks because they will open their
>> source.
>
> Both NVidia and ATI have been very supportive of Linux.  Many Debian
> and "pure GNU" advocates are upset that ATI and NVidia won't publish
> their source code to their best accelerated drivers.  I don't mind
> using a module, and a custom plug-in for the X.org X11 implementation.

You know nothing whatsoever about the subject Rexx.  ATI drivers have
been awful with them telling users to "go to google" for support. This
undeniable. Google proves me right.

>
>> Personally I'll stick with NVIdia because of their excellent support
>> over the past years. And I suggest others do too.
>
> I am glad that all of the major video chip vendors are supporting
> Linux.  Ironically, Video cards are becoming the best indicator of the
> Linux vs Vista users.  Vista users who really want Vista with all it's
> "WOW" would buy machines with DirectX-10 video cards.  Users who buy a
> PC with the intent of installing Linux, purchase machines with OpenGL
> supported.

What desktop PC video card from ATI/NVidia (the only ones to consider)
do not support openGL? You do know, I hope, that OpenGL works on ALL
versions of Microsoft Windows don't you?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index