____/ William Poaster on Tuesday 25 March 2008 11:18 : \____
> Mark Kent wrote:
>
>> Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>> news:4rw9slu5a5ct$.okdfhgy1mlmt$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx:
>>>
>>>> On 24 Mar 2008 14:02:51 GMT, Jesper Lund Stocholm wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>>>> news:17b4b5-kdt.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> So, Jesper, what's your excuse for assisting in the breaking of
>>>>>> rules?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not assisting in doing what you say.
>>>>
>>>> Just so you know what kind of a person you are dealing with Jesper,
>>>> here is some information about Mark Kent.
>>>>
>>>> As you can see he is a major hypocrite:
>>>
>>> Yes, I saw the thread with Mark's exposure
>>
>> <chuckle>
>>
>> I've always been quite open about my position, and unlike you, I post on
>> topic, pro-charter material. There isn't and never has been anything
>> to expose. I retain my openly and publicly stated position that open
>> platforms prevent vendor lock-in. I've put a line to this effect in my
>> .sig, so that anyone who thinks that I've been "exposed" can see that the
>> trolls have "exposed" a statement of what I've always said.
>>
>> If you look on the internet, you'll see, as I've repeatedly stated in
>> cola, that I travel the world lecturing on this subject. My position is
>> and always has been the same.
>>
>> A sub-text of that is that the abuse of standards processes, as you're
>> involved in, actively assists in vendor lock-in, which actively promotes
>> the abuse of customers by suppliers.
>>
>> So again, what's your excuse for assisting in pushing an immature and
>> unimplemntable document through a fast-track process which was never
>> intended for such use?
>>
>> ... and no hiding behind childish "exposures" please.
>>
> As you can see, Jesper Lund Stocholm enjoys the company of trolls like "Moshe
> Goldfarb" Flatfish.
> http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/2008/01/moshe-goldfarb-troll.html
>
> I doubt you'll get the answer you want. Like politicians, the M$ shills
> & "partners" will probably evade giving a direct answer to the question at
> all costs.
This collision between an army of scum Microsoft employs to subvert online
forums/sites and more respectable business partners does not add much to the
latter's credibility. In fact, this is reminiscent of the ballot-stuffing
phenomenon in ISO, which some call "Yes men". That's why I invited Jesper to
have this discussion elsewhere, but he did not respond to the invitation.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | "No, I didn't buy that from eBay"
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
|
|
