Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Multi-head Displays with GNU/Linux (Try *That* with Win32/OS X)

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:25:32 -0700, Tim Smith wrote:

> In article <5Axyk.27547$XB4.21085@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>  Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> > This has been is OS X forever, and earlier versions of MacOS even longer.
>>>> >
>>>> > When you order a Mac Pro from Apple, for example, you can configure it 
>>>> > with up to 4 graphics cards, with each card supporting two 2560 x 1600 
>>>> > displays.
>>>> >
>>>> > I believe similar things can be done in Windows.  It's fairly common in 
>>>> > the financial world, where people need to have a lot of information 
>>>> > available without the hassle of dealing with overlapping windows.
>>>> 
>>>> Another "open mouth insert foot" poster on the topic of 1 virtual screen
>>>> made up of 24 monitors on 12 computers.
>>>> 
>>>> Incredible.
>>>
>>> You are confused.  There may have been something about tying multiple 
>>> computers together somewhere in one of the articles Schestowitz linked 
>>> to, but the parts he chose to extract and quote in his post was about 
>>> the UI difficulty of handling multi-screen displays.
>>>
>>> What he quoted in his posts, combined with the subject line, combine to 
>>> make a claim that OS X and Windows do not handle multiple screens well, 
>>> period.
>> 
>> Obsession with what Roy said, and not what the video showed, noted.
> 
> What video?  I see no video on:
> 
> <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/library/
> os-ghosd-synergy/index.html>
> 
> And you purposefully playing dumb, or what?  When Roy says something 
> here, and people look deeper into it and find problems, you claim they 
> are obsessed for not limiting themselves to his words here.  And now, 
> commenting on his words here, rather than digging through an article to 
> find and watch some obscure alleged video, is obsession?

LiarMUTT is roy schestowitz's lap dog.
He will unequivocally do whatever Roy says and unconditionally back up his
every post.
It doesn't matter if what Roy Schestowitz says is totally false, LiarMUTT
will still *met t00* the post.

You'd think he would have the brains to at least read them before he
swallows them...

-- 
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:

http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index