-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Send comments opposing TLS-authz standard by February 11
,----[ Quote ]
| Last January, the Free Software Foundation issued an alert to efforts at the
| Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to sneak a patent-encumbered standard
| for "TLS authorization" through a back-door approval process that was
| referenced as "experimental" or "informational". The many comments sent to
| IETF at that time alerted committee members to this attempt and successfully
| prevented the standard gaining approval.
`----
http://www.fsf.org/news/reoppose-tls-authz-standard
Mozilla to Join EU Suit Against Microsoft
,----[ Quote ]
| The European Commission (EC) has granted Mozilla, the open-source
| collaboration behind the Firefox Web browser, the right to join its antitrust
| case against Microsoft, a spokesman said Monday.
|
| The Commission, Europe's top antitrust authority, charged Microsoft last
| month with distorting competition in the market for Web browsers by bundling
| in its Internet Explorer (IE) browser with the Windows operating system.
`----
http://www.pcworld.com/article/159169/mozilla_joins_eu_suit.html?tk=rss_news
Related:
Ten years of Mozilla
,----[ Quote ]
| Ten years ago, Netscape announced it would release to the public the code of
| its flag ship product, Netscape Communicator 5, making it an open source
| product. The action came at a time when Netscape was still the dominant web
| browser: 65 million users and 90% market share in the educational segment
| according to Netscape’s own accounts. But Microsoft’s Internet Explorer was
| grabbing share at a furious pace thanks to it being free (at a time Netscape
| was about$30) and specially the fact that it came bundled with Windows 95 and
| upcoming Windows 98 (released on June 1998).
`----
http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/ten-years-of-mozilla/
Gates deposition videos
,----[ Quote ]
| Boies: Do you remember that in January, 1996, a lot of OEMs were
| bundling non-Microsoft browsers?
|
| Gates: I'm not sure.
|
| Boies: What were the non-Microsoft browsers that you were
| concerned about in January of 1996?
|
| Gates: What's the question? You're trying to get me to recall
| what other browsers I was thinking about when I wrote that sentence?
|
| Boies: No, because you've told me that you don't know what you
| were thinking about when you wrote that sentence.
|
| Gates: Right.
|
| Boies: What I'm trying to do is get you to tell me what
| non-Microsoft browsers you were concerned about in January of
| 1996. If it had been only one, I probably would have used the
| name of it. Instead I seem to be using the term non-Microsoft
| browsers. My question is what non-Microsoft browsers were you
| concerned about in January of 1996?
|
| Gates: I'm sure -- what's the question? Is it -- are you asking
| me about when I wrote this e-mail or what are you asking me about?
|
| Boies: I'm asking you about January of 1996.
|
| Gates: That month?
|
| Boies: Yes, sir.
|
| Gates: And what about it?
|
| Boies: What non-Microsoft browsers were you concerned about in
| January of 1996?
|
| Gates: I don't know what you mean "concerned."
|
| Boies: What is it about the word "concerned" that you don't
| understand?
|
| Gates: I'm not sure what you mean by it.
`----
http://wincent.com/a/about/wincent/weblog/archives/2007/02/gates_depositio.php
Gates Deposition Audio and Video
,----[ Quote ]
| Here is our local copy of the depositions of Bill Gates in the
| Microsoft anti-trust suit. We did our best to convert the
| original Windows Media files into an Open format, ogg. Your
| webmaster is responsible for the video transcoding, the
| audio-only files are contributed by a Groklaw member that
| requested to stay anonymous.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=GatesDepo
,----[ Quote ]
| From: Bill Gates
| Sent: Saturday, December 05, 1989 9:44 AM
| To: Bob Muglia (Exchange); Jon DeVaan; Steven Sinofsky
| Cc: Paul Mariz
| Subject: Office rendering
|
| One thing we have got to change is our strategy -- allowing Office
| documents to be rendered very well by OTHER PEOPLES BROWSERS is one of the
| most destructive things we could do to the company.
|
| We have to stop putting any effort into this and make sure that Office
| documents very well depends on PROPRIETARY IE capabilities.
|
| Anything else is suicide for our platform. This is a case where Office has
| to to destroy Windows.
`----
http://www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/2000/PX02991.pdf
,----[ Quote ]
| "3. INTERNET EXPLORER: Unless specifically requested to the contrary
| by the end user of the Customer System and provided proper
| translation is available, COMPANY will ship MS Internet Explorer
| 2.0, and the most current subsequent higher version Product
| Releases and Version Releases thereof, preinstalled on all
| new Customer Systems..."
`----
http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/2000/PX02346.pdf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmQ2ycACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5z/wCfdw7YYaFkafncamPJBtmgGoml
MWwAoJipE3kZWjW6EVa+dJenKly2R4iK
=VMij
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
