On 2009-05-15, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 01:11:00 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Officethemovie – One to keep an eye on?
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| Having looked at the account, IMO theres certainly room for suspicion and the
>>| account may be of interest to people who dont like the idea of FUD being
>>| spread at the expense of alternative to Microsoft products.
>>| What makes me suspicious is the fact that at the time of writing this they
>>| follow no people.
> And, in typical Roy, let's not check the facts, Schestowitz form, it turns
> out his insinuations are completely wrong.
Roy posted a link and quoted it. Are you claiming Roy is responsible
for the content someone else wrote? Why aren't you griping at Goblin
for quoting ZDNet without chaecking the facts? Why aren't you blasting
the author at ZDNet for not getting it right?
That's right. Jumping on the original author isn't what you're here to
do. You're here to slam Roy every chance you get.
You really need to go out and get laid or something. Maybe see a doctor
for your restless leg syndrome. Something has your knee jerking all over
the place. You either aren't relaxing enough or you have a disease.
Intellectual property has the shelf life of a banana.
-- The great prognosticator, Bill Gates