-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ Chris Ahlstrom on Monday 12 Sep 2011 22:24 : \____
> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:35:01 +0200, Peter K??hlmann wrote:
>>> Sure is. The fire weakened the steel structure enough to let the upper
>>> stories collapse unto the lower ones. Once set in motion there was no
>> Do you understand the meaning of "free fall?" It means there was *no*
>> resistance when the building collapsed in on itself. Even supposedly
>> weakened steel would offer some resistance. And there is no viable
>> explanation of how steel on the bottom floors was "weakened" to the point
>> of collapsing. But don't take my word for it, read some of the structural
>> engineers reports on this. They call "bullshit" also.
> So people are claiming that the top fell with an acceleration of 9.8
This is untrue. Watch a video and count the seconds. Not freefall speed.
Same for WT7.
> And they're claiming that the downward moving floors had no momentum?
~~ Best of wishes
Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
Non-profit search engine proposal @ http://iuron.com
Contact E-mail address (direct): s at schestowitz dot com
Contact Internet phone (SIP): schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx (24/7)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----