-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ TomB on Tuesday 20 Sep 2011 17:52 : \____
> On 2011-09-20, the following emerged from the brain of White Spirit:
>> On 19/09/2011 20:37, TomB wrote:
>>> I read that 3.2 will include a bunch of major improvements over the
>>> early 3.x releases:
>>> Also interesting:
>>> Some very nice teams in there indeed! I'm slowly starting to think
>>> that Canonical should've simply stuck with Gnome instead of wasting
>>> their time with Unity.
>>> I wasn't too exited when I first tried out Gnome 3, but given the
>>> most recent developments, it really looks like it's turning into a
>>> very nice environment.
>> I'll have another look at it soon but it'll have to be pretty
>> amazing to tempt me away from KDE4.
> Don't even try it then ;-) In slickness, usability and general
> appearance, KDE4 just beats the crap out of Gnome 3.
> What Gnome 3 *does* have, is the cleanliness of OSX. I find it
> difficult to pinpoint what exactly makes it so, but there's something
> in the rendering of KDE that makes it more like Windows, and in Gnome
> 3 that makes it more like OSX. Does anyone else see this?
I think it's then opposite. Windows keeps copying and working more like
KDE4. KDE is always ahead.
~~ Best of wishes
Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
Managing partner @ http://scifitness.co.uk & http://iuron.com
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----