-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ Ender2070 on Tuesday 11 Oct 2011 19:55 : \____
> On Tuesday, 11 October 2011 14:41:09 UTC-4, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> The show is creative commons-licensed except where the tracks are not
>> creative commons (just freely obtainable), in which case licence
>> compatibility makes a sub-part non-creative commons (indicated clearly in
> Are you just saying this or is this documented somewhere like it legally
> No mention of creative commons. I used ctrl + f and didn't even find the word
> 'creative' by itself.
> Are you retroactively licensing them? What CC license did you use? There are a
> ton of them. You can't just say 'creative commons'. Is it CC-BY-NA? CC-NA?
> What exactly?
Go to Techrights' front page and find out. Or YouTube even...
~~ Best of wishes
Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
Managing partner @ http://scifitness.co.uk & http://iuron.com
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----