Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Proof?

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
cnrt37$2o62$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk">news:cnrt37$2o62$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk...
> Saville wrote:
>
> > Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to be accepted,
> > that, we cannot prove that God exists!
> >
> > If this is the case, then how can we prove
> >
> > that God dose 'not' exist?
>
> You can prove neither. The assumption should then be that God does not
> exist.
>
Actually, the assumption should be that God does exist. The only people that
will be disapointed to have thier beliefs shattered will be athiests.



  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Proof?
      • From: Dave Pearson <davep.news@davep.org>
    • Re: Proof?
      • From: David Wynne-Griffiths <davidwg@zetnet.co.uk>
    • Re: Proof?
      • From: "Icarus" <icarus_uk@email.com>
  • References:
    • Proof?
      • From: "Saville" <saville@uk.com>
    • Re: Proof?
      • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com>
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index