Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> __/ [ John Bokma ] on Wednesday 09 August 2006 22:02 \__
>>  meaning: it's under construction, the current date shows:
>> 11 April 2006
> You're right. I have not read it. Thanks for the heads-up.
IIRC a major reason why MS had (has) problems with CSS 2.1, it's in draft.
I am not sure if they have changed their mind, but I understand why a
developer has problems implementing features from 2.1 which are draft, let
alone 3.0. Moreover, IMO W3C has too much power :-D.
John Freelance Perl programmer: http://castleamber.com/