__/ [ Paul ] on Thursday 17 August 2006 11:24 \__
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:16:16 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ Paul ] on Thursday 17 August 2006 01:34 \__
>>
>>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:22:22 GMT, "edinny" <ralphyboy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I guess goog isn't getting that many click throughs.
>>>>So they have to jam Yahoo and get more traffic to google.
>>>
>>> What is it with you and google jamming ?
>>> You come here time after time with this crap.
>>
>>What was the name of a programming contest that Google is organising
>>annually? One of them is starting soon. I think it's called Google Code Jam
>>or something like that... can't recall.
>
>
>>I could google it, but I might get suit for fowl language and trademark
>>violation.
>
> Not al all. It is okay for Joe Public to say "google it" but not for
> journalists etc.
Thanks. I wasn't quite aware of that. *smile*
>>Jamming Yahoo? *LOL* I think the OP is just paranoid. The tubes have enough
>>capacity for all of us... at least until that senator jams them.
>
> He comes in time and time again repeating this shit. Just look back at
> past posts of his. All the same.
I saw his bogus presentation with the tubes analogy.
> He'll be saying that google has ruined his myspace page next. <G>
MySpace is self-destructive. Just spend 5 minutes observing all that s**t
that teenagers stuff in there (even images are just references). I wish HTML
was tougher to produce. Raises the entry barrier... *evil grin*
|
|
