__/ [Big Bill] on Friday 03 February 2006 12:52 \__
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:01:44 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>__/ [Borek] on Thursday 02 February 2006 20:48 \__
>>> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:34:46 +0100, Slava <kondaks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Thank you for your comments, Roy. I did have some links pointing to my
>>>> site at that time, but fewer than now. For some reason, it is also much
>>>> more difficult to build links with Google than with Yahoo or MSN. I
>>>> guess it all goes back to indexing issues with Google, as these days it
>>>> takes in general much longer time for Google to index or re-index
>>> That's not like that. Google knows about your links more than it
>>> displays. Question about which links G diplsays is probably about third
>>> most often asked here. We don't know.
>>I read somewhere (Matt Cutts' blog possibly) that only major links used to
>>be displayed (maybe historically), but now it is just a sample. He
>>re-iterated the points that people in this newsgroup have brought up in the
> He probably reads here to keep up with what's happening...
It's mutual on the face of it.