On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 14:58:45 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>__/ [Big Bill] on Friday 03 February 2006 12:52 \__
>
>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:01:44 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>__/ [Borek] on Thursday 02 February 2006 20:48 \__
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:34:46 +0100, Slava <kondaks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your comments, Roy. I did have some links pointing to my
>>>>> site at that time, but fewer than now. For some reason, it is also much
>>>>> more difficult to build links with Google than with Yahoo or MSN. I
>>>>> guess it all goes back to indexing issues with Google, as these days it
>>>>> takes in general much longer time for Google to index or re-index
>>>>> websites.
>>>>
>>>> That's not like that. Google knows about your links more than it
>>>> displays. Question about which links G diplsays is probably about third
>>>> most often asked here. We don't know.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Borek
>>>
>>>I read somewhere (Matt Cutts' blog possibly) that only major links used to
>>>be displayed (maybe historically), but now it is just a sample. He
>>>re-iterated the points that people in this newsgroup have brought up in the
>>>past.
>>
>> He probably reads here to keep up with what's happening...
>
>It's mutual on the face of it.
I read very little of his stuff, I've had a look but I tend to read
other folks' synopses of it.
BB
--
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/yankee-candles/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/brian-baker-collection/index.html
kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gifty! Shiny! BB!
|
|