__/ [ Mr. Polzek ] on Wednesday 22 March 2006 15:04 \__
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dvrltl$1plk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> .biz, .com, or .co.<COUNTRY_SUFFIX> (and exceptions like .de)
>>
>> http://www.computeruser.com/resources/dictionary/domains.html
>>
>
> what about .info then?
>
> Paul
__/ [ Mr. Polzek ] added on Wednesday 22 March 2006 15:06 \__
> Well, the target will be entire EU, so any local suffixes are not welcome.
> .Info should do the job, shouldn't it?
It depends on personal perception, but I prefer to visit and cite Web sites
that are non-profit-making (at least on the shallow face of it). I would
have gone for .info.
Be warned, however, as many spam sites use this "info"rmative disguise to
embed spam. Thus, filter criteria for spam do not favour the suffix. Again,
it's very subjective. If .net is available, go for it.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | "Signature pending approval"
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
3:10pm up 14 days 7:47, 8 users, load average: 0.75, 0.88, 0.91
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
