Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Google Trends

  • Subject: Re: Google Trends
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:31:30 +0100
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <0kk96298mj1sthsnl7jqd0ss59uobrpj7u@4ax.com> <Xns97C1961B0984Ccastleamber@130.133.1.4> <4ck8s3F1633mfU1@individual.net> <nmr9621n5vm9cjfnakjduet4fqlgrsav15@4ax.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Paul B ] on Friday 12 May 2006 21:24 \__

> On Fri, 12 May 2006 22:18:13 +0200, tonnie <t.prasing@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>>John Bokma wrote:
>>> Paul B <lamewolf2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>Dunno if it has been mentioned in here before, but some may find this
>>>>of use :
>>>>http://www.google.com/trends
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yup
>>
>>I presume both and agree.
> 
> I was trying to work that out too <g>

I think that I have finally figured out the effect of using "google" as a
synonym for "search".

http://www.google.com/trends?q=google%2C+search&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all

*silly grin*

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      | Othello for Win32/Linux: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  9:25pm  up 15 days  4:22,  9 users,  load average: 0.44, 0.14, 0.11
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index