Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> __/ [ Roy Culley ] on Sunday 08 October 2006 01:08 \__
>> begin risky.vbs
>> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Sunday 08 October 2006 00:39 Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>>> Toplist of 'Quality' Posters 
>>>>> Pos Poster
>>>>> 1. Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> 122 2. Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ROTFL. The COLA gang : where mutual masturbation is a ritual, not a
>>>> right ...
>>> Just going back to a comment that you made a little while ago
>>> re. Roy S. and his employers - am I to understand that the opinions
>>> that you yourself express here are the official ones of CERN?
>> Do you really believe that an imbecile like quark works at CERN? Bog
>> cleaning aside that is.
> If he worked at CERN he would be using/advocating GNU/Linux* like the rest of
> the company rather than rave about his XP AV software. And no... dabbling in
> Linux a few months ago wouldn't count.
Cern had one of the best Gophers on the net, all those years ago, just
before Tim Berners-Lee came up with the web. As Cern's key personnel
are physicists, I cannot imagine them not comprehending open-source, as
it essentially follows scientific method in its development model.
Also, as scientists are always short of investment cash, then reducing
spend in this way would make sense.
> What this guy needs is less work with hadron quarks at CERN and a little more
> medication. His posts have proven him to be a psychopath who should be
> accommodated in a secure cell for a while, along with his fish. And, yes, I
> see their posts because people reply to them and quote.
> *Or BSD, or UNIX.
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
In which level of metalanguage are you now speaking?