B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 19:06 Hadron Quark wrote:
>> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 17:59 Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>> We, or I maybe, asked for some common sense : list article headers and
>>>> the links to the original posts next to them.
>>> Feel free - go right ahead and do it.
>> Typical Linux advocate. Why do it once properly and easy to sue when we
>> can do it 20 times badly, and inefficiently and offer "choice"?
>> Give me one, on advantage over the way Mark has done it to the simple
>> "title : link" digest.
> No - *you* are the one mouthing off.
> - *you* are the one telling everybody how it "should" be done.
> - get on and do it - we are waiting.
I never offered. My solution was simple : post a digest in the first
As for how it should be done : refer to previous posts.
I really is that easy for anyone with any common sense.
> - we are also waiting for you list of the other approx. 4 "supporters" of
> Roy's news posts, together with your list of "oodles" of people opposed to
Sure. Live in your dream world. You think people tune into his reposts
of yesterdays news? Those of us with real jobs see it on real web pages.