Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Faster Chips Are Leaving Programmers in Their Dust

* Tim Smith fired off this tart reply:

> On 2007-12-18, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've been on usenet at least as far back as Feb 28, 1984:
>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/net.unix-wizards/msg/bdd2d3b2889d6c5c?dmode=source>
>
> That's almost 24 years.

1. I'd like to know how the hell that stuff got archived 24 years ago,
   and survived to this day, when you can't even find a good rebuttal to
   this:

      http://groups.google.com/group/alt.folklore.computers/msg/99ce4b0555bf35f4

       QUESTION: I read in a newspaper that in 1981 you said, ``640K of
       memory should be enough for anybody.'' What did you mean when you
       said this?

       ANSWER: I've said some stupid things and some wrong things, but
       not that. No one involved in computers would ever say that a
       certain amount of memory is enough for all time. 

   (Note the weasel wording.  He adds "for all time".  Why?)

2. "&& and || do not mean the same thing to sh and csh.  In fact
   they mean exactly the opposite!  This can be annoying."

   You seem to have gotten a little more strict about your meanings as
   you aged <grin>.

3. {decvax,ucbvax}!ihnp4!sdcrdcf!trwrb!wlbr!callan!tim

   Ahhhh, the old bang-paths.

4. Around that time, I was a grad student, and our access to the UseNet
   was through distillations retrieved and posted by some sysop at
   Vandy.


-- 
Tux rox!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index