Geico Caveman <spammers-go-here@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <f3oipq$pk6$1@xxxxxxxx>,
>> Geico Caveman <spammers-go-here@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Since you feel compelled to spread possibly untrue and certainly
>>> unsubstantiated reports, do we assume correctly that you are currently
>>> indulging in a pump and dump scheme with regards to your Microvell stock
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Bailo, you should know that that is illegal and you could end up facing a
>>> long time behind bars for something like this.
>>
>> No, spreading stories that have been published by a major wire service
>> and picked up by the press around the world is not illegal.
>
> A major wire service with a record of being inaccurate about open source ?
> You might as well get your Iraq news from Fox.
>
>>
>> Sure, reporters at wire services might not be in the same league as
>> Roy's anonymous (and probably imaginary) sources...
>>
>>
>
> Most of Roy's sources tend to be cross-referenced and his stories actually
> turn out to be true. Unlike Reuters that has been discredited more than
> once about its reporting on open source.
ROTFLM Muwahahahahaha ......
Stop press.
COLA claims Roybot "Spammer" Schestowitz is more reputable
than Reuters.
And in further news .....
--
"There is no such thing as intellectual property" - Marky Kent (in COLA Nov-2006)
|
|