In comp.os.linux.advocacy, 7
<website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:58:47 GMT
<bgWIi.18249$c_1.17848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Micoshaft Asstroturfer Hadron wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:
>
>> ml2mst <ml2mst@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Oh dear, I've figured out (yesterday) that the SueME Linux
>>> distribution exists.
>>>
>>> http://suemelinux.com
>>>
>>> I downloaded it and ran it in a Virtual Box, using only 128 MiB of
>>> virtual RAM and it ran fantastically (without a glitch).
>>>
>>> I think Shane Coyle is the mastermind behind this distro and it was
>>> basically supposed as a joke, but we could really make this work, for
>>> example including the entire documentation, posted at Boycott Novel.
>>>
>>> Welcome to the information age!
>>
>> Pathetic. Actively encouraging people to break the law.
>
> Fool! He has not broken any law!!!
I should note, of course, that no one has, pedantically
speaking, broken the law until a conviction has been
obtained in a court trial, or a confession. He can, of
course, be alleged to have broken a law -- and one hopes
in that case as to specifics when a jury (or judge in lieu
thereof) receives the case.
>
> But you seem to be breaking the law asstroturfing for micoshaft corporation
> to support your spliffing habbits.
>
Um....are you charging him under Title 21, Chapter 13, Subchapter I,
Part D, section 844, paragraph (a) (simple possession), then?
:-)
Or is this more under something under Title 18, Part I, Chapter 47
(fraud/false statements) or Chapter 96 (RICO)?
Chapter 105 (sabotage), 113A (telemarketing fraud),
41 (extortion), 63 (mail fraud), and 65 (malicious mischief)
are also vaguely possible.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/
Unfortunately, there's no chapter for extreme silliness... :-)
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"640K ought to be enough for anybody."
- allegedly said by Bill Gates, 1981, but somebody had to make this up!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
