-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:16:59 +0100,
Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> * Tim Smith peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>> In article <UYidnUFlnevJhCPanZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> alt <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why should the document format support all of Microsoft's (undocumented)
>>>> legacy crap? Shouldn't that be the job of the application?
>>>
>>> The application needs to be able to save information about that legacy
>>> "crap", hence there is a need for some way to do that in the document
>>> format.
>>
>> Where's the 'need' for that? You want to have access to all features of
>> those old documents? Keep an old copy of the proprietary operating
>> system and proprietary Word processor around.
>
> LOL. I am not sure if it is stupidity or naivety on your part. Did it
> never cross your mind that you need to access the contents on an
> uptodate OS? For *obvious* reasons I won't even bother to go into.
>
makes no sense. We are discussing document formats, not the OS. Are you
saying that the MS document formats rely on the OS for something?
>>
>> What's that you say? You're worried about those items eventually being
>> unusable? Scan or convert the legacy document to PDF, already an ISO
>> standard, and readable by open-source software.
>
> Snigger. Clueless. Why would they want to do anything of the sort?
So they can avoid lock in. Which is pretty much the whole frigging point
to a multiple vendor format.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHvyYEd90bcYOAWPYRAktvAKDVjmkwrggz9UBfXib4ftmhs7BN7ACeLJcf
rUshbkBwLPPR4pg9qZy0IsU=
=G2mw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
The United States of America: Screwing with the
English Language for over 200 years.
--Mike Sphar
|
|