Bob Hauck <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 21:46:05 +0200, Hadron Quark
> <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> If the linux code bases continue to branch at the rate they're doing
>> so that some pimply programmer can reease his own WM or distro then
>> theres no hope for any of us.
>
> Unfortunately for your control-freak fantasies, there's no way for you
Control freak fantasies? Where have I said we should limit Linux's
customization features? Answer no where. But leave it to the people at
the desktop. Distibuting the development skills across 350 distros is
plain bonkers to anyone with half a business brain.
> or anyone else to tell those pimply programmers what to do.
If you dont, they often churn out shit.
>
> I count that as a feature, not a bug. In fact, this freedom to do what
> you want is pretty much the whole damn point. You can take your fascist
> ideas and shove 'em up your ass.
Fascist ideas? To want Linux stable and on peoples desktops?
Obviously you are one of these nutball zealots : so *plonk*.
>
>
> --
> -| Bob Hauck
> -| A proud member of the unhinged moonbat horde.
> -| http://www.haucks.org/
--
You can see that there are 25 unread articles in `news.announce.newusers'.
There are no unread articles, but some ticked articles, in
`alt.fan.andrea-dworkin' (see that little asterisk at the beginning of the
line?)
You can fuck that up to your heart's delight by fiddling with the
`gnus-group-line-format' variable.
-- From the (ding) Gnus 5 documentation, by Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
|
|
