On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 12:54:48 -0500, DFS wrote:
> Kier wrote:
>
>> Roy says he didn't lie, and I would be prepared to accept that, on
>> balance. Except for the fact that it's happened somewhat often.
>
> "somewhat often"? Practically all the time, you mean.
No, I don't mean that, or I would have said so.
>
>
>
>> So, maybe Erik has some grounds for assuming this is
>> deliberate. Clearly, he seems to think it was.
>
> Of course he's a deliberate (and outrageous) liar. Along with Rex Ballard,
He bears no comparison to Rex. Why do you drag Rex into every little
dispute which does not concern him?
> he knows this is the ONLY way people will pay him any attention. This
Balls. If he merely wanted attention, he'd be on YouTube.
> goes back to your question about "balanced and factual"; if the dog and
> pony show known as "Rex and Roy" made balanced, factual posts, they
> would be ignored.
>
>
>> Is Roy a liar? I don't know for certain. How can anyone really,
>> actually be certain.
>
> By comparing his thread titles with what was actually written, or with
> what actually happened?
>
> It's a fact Roy Schestowitz is a liar. I picked one of his posts at
> random
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/94de92aa1fb30692/4dd3cc0d03291c5a?lnk=st&q=&rnum=5&hl=en#4dd3cc0d03291c5a
>
> He claims MS stole Sun's idea, but there's no evidence of that in the
> article he linked.
Claims, yes. can you actually *prove* he was aware it was otherwise? And
you may have forgotten that I *did not* say he always told the truth.
--
Kier
|
|