AB <fardblossom@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2007-02-12, Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> Hans Schneider wrote:
>
>>> So your comments are worthless. At least 30% of his comments are being
>>> totally not accurate for the articles. You closing your eyes does not be
>>> making his spam any more of the accuracy level.
>
> Hey, Hans Quark. Your phony pretend-english "mistakes" come across as
> similar to some of the Czech Brothers skits on the older Saturday Night
> Live programs. You didn't used to be a writer on there, did you?
Huh? Sorry? You are lost me.
>
> But you slip-up from time to time, giving away the fact that it's a
> faux trait. The TV version was better. So I guess either the writer was
> someone else or you had another person, or persons, assist you in
> working out the errors.
>
>> So you accuse Roy of "spamming" the group with inaccurate posts.
>> Even though nearly all linux advocates have asked him to even *increase* the
>> numbers
>
> If I had the wherewithal, I'd assist in upping the numbers. It brings
> news to the group that might not be seen elsewise (even though I don't
> read all of them), it furthers and supports the fact that linux is
> growing, and it puts the trolls (like Hadron Schneider) on the
> defensive enough that it would be worth it just for that.
I am using Linux. What are you problematic about?
>
>> Yet 100% of flatfish posts are lies and totally inaccurate. Same for DFS and
>> you, Hadron
>>
>> But nobbody of you windows using scum ever complains about this garbage and
>> the impersonations so frequently done by the windows using cola posters,
>> who, without any exception, are worthless road kill at best
>
> One must be filled with hypocrisies and contradictions to troll on
> behalf of a convicted monopoly.
I do not understand you. Sorry.
|
|
