On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:50:58 +0000, Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Then why did you quote your own post, unecessarily? Are you too dim to
>know what you're doing?
It was 2 different threads.
Live with it.
>Only the first line or two. That was quite enough.
That's all it takes baby to get you hooked!
>> (BTW in case you haven't noticed, you'll be reading Schestowitz's spam
>> at least 8 times under different misleading subject lines. He thinks
>> people don't notice. Maybe you haven't? )
>Who said I read it? It's not spam anyway, and you saying it day and night
>will never make it so. Maybe you should crawl back into the hole you
>crawled out of, since you're making so little contribution to Linux
Why not read digg and see what THAT community thinks of Roy and his
Here, I'll even get you started!
Roy Schestowitz is at -100 on that one.
A comment that says:
" You should see him in comp.os.linux.advocacy!! Spamming the entire
group with 1000s of posts each month.
He's turned that group into a virtual wasteland of messages with
little or no replies. He's also been asked, many times, to group his
messages into a digest, maybe even with html hot links, but he refuses
because his goal is to pollute the search engines with his name.
I have him filtered in comp.os.linux.advocacy, like most people in the
Is at +23.
Another one which says:
"According to his Google profile, he has *forty thousand* (!) posts to
COLA alone. Add to that 11,000+ to Digg, and who knows where else. For
all we know "he" has a Slashdot account with another five thousand.
"He" runs what, like five or six high-volume "boycottX.com" attack
Does anyone still believe that this "guy" is just a kid getting a
masters' degree or whatever he claims he does for a living? Please.
Schez smells like paid astroturfers, shills and trolls."
Is at +20
Another one which says:
"@HonoredMule: The erratic behavior you see is caused by multiple
people posting under the same identity. It's easy enough to see."
Is at +6
And another one that says:
" I have noticed that the quality of "his" comments, and also "his"
general attitude tends to shift erratically. 3-4 months ago, he earned
a blocking by me. About 2 months ago, I unblocked him, and then later
thought highly enough of his posts to add him as a friend, but the
content he submitted was on a short-term high that quickly degenerated
back into novell hate-spam and random linux-related crap. Lately, his
comments have also degenerated back to block-worthiness loaded with "I
can talk about linux stuff too, and I give this article a B+" junk. I
didn't know he was so active in other communities too, but he sure as
hell doesn't have time for this if he's actually a student, at least
unless we're the test subjects for his thesis"
Is also at +6
Now to put this into perspective, this is a LINUX GROUP ON DIGG!
It attracts LINUX SUPPORTERS so it will tend to be skewed in that
So how come THEY, the REAL Linux supporters, have Roy Schestowitz all
figured out and comp.os.linux.advocacy is way behind the curve.
And don't think this is an isolated incident.
There are plenty of other examples.
Considering Roy Schestowitz posts to groups that are supposedly his
life, IOW Linux, his MISERABLE digg rating of -0.6 says it all.
Why are you COLA'ites so ignorant?