In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:58:00 +0100
<2168746.uKGVPo82Xf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> ____/ The Ghost In The Machine on Wednesday 26 September 2007 00:35 : \____
>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote
>> on Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:16:28 +0100
>> <8165936.lm8zQlpK5L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> ____/ The Ghost In The Machine on Tuesday 25 September 2007 21:58 : \____
>>>
>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Roy Schestowitz
>>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote
>>>> on Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:30:29 +0100
>>>> <4568605.onuEIfVgFJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>> How to Quit Windows and cope with Windows Withdrawal Syndrome
>>>>>
>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>> | Now that you have decided to quit Windows for good and
>>>>> | to switch over to a Desktop Linux Distribution, following
>>>>> | these basic steps will help you a lot. Initially, a basic
>>>>> | knowledge about GNU/Linux is important. What is it really
>>>>> | and how does it differ from Windows?
>>>>> `----
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.raiden.net/?cat=2&aid=307
>>>>
>>>> Heh. A few notes.
>>>>
>>>> [1] Intel, if I'm not totally mistaken, is on record as
>>>> supporting Linux. Admittedly, a quick Google coughed
>>>> up only a video and a wireless driver or two, and this
>>>> three-year-old article:
>>>>
>>>> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5161041.html
>>>>
>>>> A search on Intel's website also coughed up their C++ compiler,
>>>> a performance analyzer (VTune(tm)), a math kernel library
>>>> (not sure if that's kernel as in Linux, kernel as in core,
>>>> or kernel as in kerning transformations), a Fortran compiler,
>>>> a threading library, and a whole lot of other stuff -- 12900
>>>> in all, if the count's accurate.
>>>>
>>>> Kudos to Intel.
>>>>
>>>> [2] Drafts aren't hard on Linux, even if one is using gedit.
>>>> CUPS is also very capable, if one wants to print them later.
>>>>
>>>> [3] I'm not sure I like the notion of destroying Windows
>>>> install CDs (I'm a pack rat; I admit it :-) )...the
>>>> temptation is there, admittedly, but they'll also grow
>>>> stale anyway. I have some Win95 stuff flying about, and
>>>> even older Win3.1 installation packs. Do I use them? No.
>>>> Still, for those of a certain mindset, it's probably best
>>>> to put them out of reach, and if that involves destroying
>>>> them, so be it.
>>>
>>> I suppose the following is out of the question then:
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcOuwXTOHy4
>>
>> That was absolutely pathetic. All it did was tip over. :-)
>> Proof once again that Linux is very robust, even when
>> hit with a shotgun. (Or a lawsuit.)
>
> Watch Xandrosoft GNU/Linux:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8TjLIYxP1A
>
> The shooting begins a few minutes after the stuff. Well overboard.
Now we're talking. :-) Nice shotgun (generally my
favorite weapon in DOOM, Unreal, Quake, Nexuiz, ...).
>
>> This one might be more interesting.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVbf9tOGwno
>>
>> Easy installation guaranteed! Too bad the media doesn't
>> survive the installation process.
>>
>>>
>>> Or one of these assorted BSD 'rituals' for SCO...
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=unix+sco&search=Search
>>>
>>> Skip the first (although it's funny too and I mentioned it in BN.com last
>>> year).
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ytEUWz4EQQ
>>
>> is ... interesting. :-)
>>
>> The next three apparently are various attempts to exorcise SCO:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhtjCWwSqmU
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLDLdl4ytoY
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ3bpCh4kTk
>>
>> The second one is the longest. Dunno if they worked or not;
>> the courts are arguably more effective. :-)
>
> Haha. I couldn't manage to find Judge Kimball among those in this group.
>
>>>> [4] "Back up and format" is an interesting requirement,
>>>> but how does one restore later on? The article could be
>>>> clearer on this. The good news: anyone familiar with DVD
>>>> or CD burning software should be able to burn a DVD or CD
>>>> that Linux can read, and I would be surprised if Linux
>>>> can't read the Microsoft extensions (Joliet is the only
>>>> one I'm somewhat familiar with). Or one can use ancient
>>>> 1.44 MB floppies, or even tape drives, in a pinch.
>>>>
>>>> [5] As usual, the author(s) confuse Linux, the kernel, with
>>>> an arbitrary Linux-based distribution. *shrug*
>>>>
>>>> [6] There is no mention of how to avoid Windows in
>>>> new equipment, but that's probably beyond the scope of
>>>> the article anyway. One of Microsoft's more insidious
>>>> "innovations", after all, is the bundling of Windows
>>>> on prepackaged PCs. Even if one later wipes Windows,
>>>> Microsoft still gets paid.
>>>>
>>>> (lucky bastards :-) )
>>>
>>> Bell used to have similar schemes going on. That's how you
>>> build a monopolistic framework and a cash machine. If the
>>> government does not intervene, something
>>> is rotten (or someone is paid).
>>>
>>
>> Microsoft "innovation" at its best.
>
> Innovative strategies. Buy our your competition, hire companies
> to sue your competitors, deploy lobbyists in Washington, start
> smear campaigns, change the US patent system, change DRM
> circumvention laws around the world, sign deals with opponents
> in order to have them implement your technology, bribe votes to
> get support, have PR agents send out letters on behalf of dead people...
>
Hm. With all of this going on, where do they find time to
actually develop Vista?
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux. Because life's too short for a buggy OS.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|